Monthly vs Quarterly Dividend Stocks
What actually separates monthly payers from quarterly payers, in numbers.
Monthly payment is often marketed as an advantage in itself. The data shows what it really is: a structural marker. Monthly payers are mostly REITs, BDCs and income vehicles — higher-yielding as a group, but with durability scores that trail the quarterly mainstream.
Key Observations
- Monthly payers (61) are a small fraction of quarterly payers (1090), but their median yield is 6.43% versus 2.47% — the monthly cohort skews toward high-payout structures (REITs, BDCs).
- Median DividendRank tells the durability side: 66 for quarterly payers versus 55 for monthly — payment cadence is a cash-flow feature, not a quality signal.
Monthly vs quarterly payers (active common stocks)
| Frequency | Payers | Median yield | Median DividendRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly | 61 | 6.43% | 55 |
| Quarterly | 1090 | 2.47% | 66 |
Methodology
Each active common stock is classed by the frequency of its latest regular payment; the table reports count, median current yield and median DividendRank for the monthly and quarterly cohorts.
Caveats
Cadence proves nothing about safety in either direction — the gap in median rank reflects the kinds of businesses that choose each schedule, not the schedule itself.
Sources: Dividendly dividend history and computed metrics. Computed Oct 19, 2026.
Related Pages
Citing this research
These figures are computed from Dividendly's own stored dividend history and are free to read. If you reference them, please cite the page and the date the figures were computed — they are recalculated as new payments are recorded.
Dividendly. “Monthly vs Quarterly Dividend Stocks.”
Computed Oct 19, 2026. https://dividendly.ai/data/monthly-vs-quarterly-dividend-stocks/
We have not set reuse terms for this data. For anything beyond quotation with attribution, ask us first — some underlying inputs come from licensed providers.
Data updated Oct 19, 2026. This research page is generated from Dividendly's structured market and dividend dataset using the approach described on our methodology and data sources pages. Data is automatically validated using defined rules and may also be periodically reviewed. Research only, not investment advice. Spotted a data error? Report it.